Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:13:26 -0700

From: Zsolt Balogh

Subject: Open supracondylar femur fx

Dear List,

What would be your method of choice to fix this Gr IIIa open high energy supracondylar femur fx, neuro vasculary intact. 30YO male MBA hemodynamically stable, no chest injuries. Right temporal bone fx, no IC bleeding on the head CT. Images attached.

Best Regards,

Zsolt Balogh, MD
Trauma Surgeon
Szeged, Hungary


Reply at: Orthopaedic Trauma Association forum

Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:19:11 -0500

From: Adam J. Starr, M.D.

Hello Dr. Balogh.

My choice would be to do give the patient antibiotics, do a thorough I&D, and reduce and stabilize the fracture with a locking plate, such as a LISS.

Good luck.

Adam Starr
Dallas


Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 13:59:25 -0400

From: Bruce P. Meinhard

Irrigate, Debride, Prophylactic Antibiotics, Anti-tetanus Prophylaxis, ORIF with LISS Plate or equivalent device ( Blade Plate or Dynamic Hip Screw).


Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:39:51 -0500

From: Frederic B. Wilson, M.D.

Dear Zsolt,

I would I&D the wound, removing only obviously devitalized tissue and bone. I would probably also opt for temporary stabilization with a spanning External Fixator.

On second washout I would stabilize the intercondylar split with cannulated lagged screws and apply a Femoral LISS plate through a small incision.

Fred

Frederic B. Wilson, M.D. Trauma & Adult Reconstruction
ETMC First Physicians - Orthopaedic Clinic
700 Olympic Plaza Circle, Suite 510
Tyler, TX


Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:12:58 +0600

From: Alexander Chelnokov

Hello Zsolt,

ZB> What would be your method of choice to fix this Gr IIIa open high energy supracondylar femur fx, neuro vasculary intact. 30YO male MBA hemodynamically stable, no chest injuries. Right temporal

Antegrade closed locked nailing works very fine for such a fracture pattern in our settings. Same must be about retrograde. Maybe after a period of ex-fix and soft tissue healing - depends on the wound condition and local protocols.

Dear colleagues who prefer LISS or other plate for the case - why?

Best regards,

Alexander N. Chelnokov
Ural Scientific Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
str.Bankovsky, 7. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia


Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:46:18 -0500

From: Frederic B. Wilson, M.D.

Alex,

Re LISS: Easier. Less difficulty with controlling the intercondylar segment. No further damage to the knee joint (retrograde). No involvement of the hip area (antegrade). Better options for controlling Varus/valgus, procurvatum/recurvatum at the fracture with this segmental defect.

Fred

Frederic B. Wilson, M.D. Trauma & Adult Reconstruction
ETMC First Physicians - Orthopaedic Clinic
700 Olympic Plaza Circle, Suite 510
Tyler, TX


Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:49:17 EDT From: Tadabq

perfect for retrograde nail + lag screw with this large a distal fragment and this much meta-diaphyseal comminution and this degree of soft tissue injury. after treatment of open fracture

MUCH less muscle dissection laterally and at the very comminuted distal diaphysis, equal tobetter fixation with less blood loss, probably better early motion and earlier weight bearing. IF you do have a problem it will be easier to handle than if LISS or other plate fails.

TD


Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:53:25 +0500

From: Alexander Chelnokov

Hello Fred,

FBWMD> Re LISS: Easier.

AFAIR there are specific pitfalls of the technique.

FBWMD> Less difficulty with controlling the intercondylar segment.

Temporary wires solve the problem.

FBWMD> No further damage to the knee joint (retrograde).

Do you really mean tissue dissection needed for the plate placement provides no further damage of the joint and periarticular structures?

FBWMD> No involvement of the hip area (antegrade).

This hardly ever is of great importance for a case like this. BTW modern nail design for lateral insertion minimizes the involvement.

FBWMD> Better options for controlling Varus/valgus, procurvatum/recurvatum at the fracture with this segmental defect.

Using of some wires secured to the Ilizarov ring or arc provides any needed control.

Dynamization can also be a useful option.

Best regards,

Alexander N. Chelnokov
Ural Scientific Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
str.Bankovsky, 7. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia


Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:21:27 +0000

From: aobonedoc

Pulsatile I&D, perc can screws to maintain reduced condyles, spanning ex-fix across knee joint. repeat in 48 hours, I&D when definitive fixation possible based on wound, probable retrograde nailing, accepting risk of condyle displacement and careful attention to screw placement initially (if done at a seperate time of IM nailing). I would probably supplement with BMP (but this is $5,000). --

Sincerely and respectively,

M. Bryan Neal, MD
Arlington Orthopedics and Hand Surgery Specialists, Ltd.
Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005


Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:47:07 -0800

From: Sean E. Nork

Perhaps this can fixed with a relatively inexpensive implant such as a 95 degree angled blade plate after reduction and stabilization of the intercondylar component of the fracture with strategically placed lag screws. If indirect reduction techniques are used, this is still likely to heal (ala Bolhofner) without bone graft.

Sean

Sean E. Nork, MD
Dept Orthopaedic Surgery
Harborview Medical Center


Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:25:40 -0700

From: Terry Finlayson

I would make a strong argument that lateral soft tissue dissection for plate placement (especially since debridement of open fracture is necessary anyway) is much less damaging to the articular surface than a retrograde nail.

Also, even though antegrade nailing is possible, all the discussion about using Ilizarov wires, rings and/or arcs takes this method from the realm of straightforward to the complex IMHO.

I think retrograde IM nail is a good option, but one needs to be sure that the fracture is out to length with this comminuted metaphysis. I have used 95 degree blade plates, condylar screws w/ side plate, supracondylar nails, long retrograde IM nails and now, more recently the locking anatomic plate. The locking plate technology is a big step forward in my hands to achieve better reduction and more stable fixation while preserving blood supply in these fractures.

Terry I. Finlayson, M.D.
Logan, UT USA


Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 22:55:38 +0500

From: Alexander Chelnokov

Hello Terry,

TF> I would make a strong argument that lateral soft tissue dissection for plate placement (especially since debridement of open fracture is necessary anyway) is much less damaging to the articular surface than a retrograde

A stab wound and 10-12 mm hole in the intercondlar notch AFAIK doesn't create any obvious problem. I am not sure about the wound and muscles after LISS.

TF> Also, even though antegrade nailing is possible, all the discussion about using Ilizarov wires, rings and/or arcs takes this method from the realm of straightforward to the complex IMHO.

The complexity is mostly in our minds, and anyway outside the femur. When the nail is in place nobody would guess how one has reached so perfect reduction ;-)

I know about a problem that rings in the US are single use so such approach can be of unacceptable high cost. But really the technique expands our capabilities comparatively to standard half-pin distractors.

TF> I think retrograde IM nail is a good option, but one needs to be sure that the fracture is out to length with this comminuted metaphysis.

No such need with LISS?

TF> forward in my hands to achieve better reduction and more stable fixation while preserving blood supply in these fractures.

I can't realize its advantages for cases where open reduction of articular surface is not necessary. It looks much more invasive than closed nail. And any plate has its inherent flaw - lateral placement leads to breakage in case of delayed union/nonunion.

Best regards,

Alexander N. Chelnokov
Ural Scientific Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
str.Bankovsky, 7. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia


Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 00:27:04 -0800

From: tim kavanaugh

Hi,

Having trained under orthopaedic traumatologists in residency I have a huge amount of respect for the opinions that have been recorded on this topic. Since I have been in private practice for over two years now, I know how this would be treated. In private practice this would get cannulated screws across the intra-articular component and a retrograde nail. This is a no brainer. All of the opinions about the LISS plate are great, but if you dont have residents, this takes too much time. No one can argue about the healing potential of a retrograde nail in this situation.

Tim Kavanaugh MD
Anchorage, AK


Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 00:26:39 -0600

From: Frederic B. Wilson, M.D.

Tim,

Level I Trauma Center, ETMC in Tyler Texas. No residents. This is about a 30-40 minute case for us. More stable, less worry about varus/valgus toggle, less damage to the knee joint.

Fred

Frederic B. Wilson, M.D. Trauma & Adult Reconstruction
ETMC First Physicians - Orthopaedic Clinic
700 Olympic Plaza Circle, Suite 510
Tyler, TX


Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:06:20 -0800

From: Chip Routt

Tim-

You've recommended a technique in Alaska based on perceived technical speed?? Would you choose/advocate that for your surgeon...your surgeon chooses your operation based on how fast he/she can accomplish the procedure?

Do you also suggest that we speed the irrigation because one liter is faster than six or twelve? Do you advocate that we limit the debridement to the easily visualized field because extending the wound margins to further explore would take more time? If speed is the focus, why advocate cannulated screws...why not just sling in a few cheaper screws? Chop-chop!

Please consider the patient management based on quality of care principles (debridement, reduction, stability, wound management, rehab) rather than operative speed and resident allocations.

We learned a long time ago that a fast operation/surgeon does not necessarily reflect improved surgical skill and result. We also know that an expensive implant does not always equal a good implant.

Surgery should not be a race, unless we have a patient in a dire situation.

Many surgeons also realize that helping residents-in-training learn how to care for patients does not necessarily facilitate an operative event.

Let's accept that we're all trying to be efficient, but please don't lose sight of the patient and his/her situation.

There are numerous ways to successfully treat this patient's open femur fracture, and each method has its own issues and benefits.

Wound and fracture debridement, articular reduction, axial alignment and rotation, and stability must be prioritized, and in turn should diminish infection risk and speed recovery.

A planed and methodical initial operation likely avoids subsequent "corrective/recovery" procedures.

Quality-

Chip

M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, WA 98104-2499


Date: 10/31/2004, 12:13

From Zsolt Balogh @ http://weborto.net/

Dear Alex,

This is what we have done... As generally true for LISS look at the bone not the hardware. There are two more screws above. The one not completely in got damaged head.

Zsolt